User talk:IainMoyles

From UBC Wiki

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
MATH 101220:41, 25 October 2012
MER participant118:49, 28 September 2012
reply to Philip200:44, 3 April 2012
Review of solution020:01, 12 March 2012
Display of math220:21, 6 March 2012

Wrote a solution for the dreaded problem 6 of the MATH 101 April 2008 exam. If you could review it, we would be so close to finishing that exam!

David Kohler (talk)18:14, 1 October 2012

Looks like it's been reviewed. I can't seem to add hints anymore. I remember you used to be able to click on the word and modify the code, now the words (like "Hint") are no longer links.

IainMoyles (talk)19:00, 19 October 2012

Not sure what you mean.

To create a new hint, just create it at .../Question/Hint_2 (or 3, 4, 5 whatever is relevant)

David Kohler (talk)20:41, 25 October 2012
 
 

MER participant

Hi Iain,

We are opening the MER project to undergrads and have started a new way to list who is a contributor, so if you could add [[Category:MER Participant]] anywhere in your userpage, you would then be listed as a contributor. Cheers, David

David Kohler (talk)16:33, 28 September 2012

Done :).

IainMoyles (talk)18:49, 28 September 2012
 

reply to Philip

Hey Iain,

Philip Lowen gave a suggestion for Science:Math_Exam_Resources/Courses/MATH257/December_2011/Question_2_(a) (see the discussion page). Could you check it out and give him a quick reply?

Cheers,

David Kohler23:52, 31 March 2012

Already taken care of.

IainMoyles22:24, 2 April 2012

awesome! thx

David Kohler00:44, 3 April 2012
 
 

Review of solution

Hi Iain,

Could you take a look at the discussions of Question 6, *solution* subpage? (If you have time, you can read about the optical illusion of the original diagram on the Question 6 mother page discussion).

simontse20:01, 12 March 2012

Display of math

Hey Iain,

I've reformatted the solution you wrote for Question A4, you can compare with your original work in the history. I'm using the wikipedia math style guidelines that exist and which basically recommend to use html or wiki formatting whenever the latex rendering distorts the text too much. What do you think?

David Kohler17:58, 6 March 2012

I didn't realise there was a recommended style to math, I've just been going with what looks best. I think the changes you made look good here, and thanks for the heads up!

IainMoyles20:07, 6 March 2012
) Well I don't think we really have a recommendation ourselves, what the wiki community does seems pretty good and I agree with you that what should drive us is what looks best while promoting some kind of cohesion throughout the wiki. We'll see where this goes as more contributors participate.
David Kohler20:21, 6 March 2012