Science:Math Exam Resources/Courses/MATH220/December 2011/Question 03

{{#incat:MER QGQ flag|{{#incat:MER QGH flag|{{#incat:MER QGS flag|}}}}}}

MATH220 December 2011

  •  Q1 (a)  •  Q1 (b)  •  Q1 (c)  •  Q1 (d)  •  Q1 (e)  •  Q1 (f)  •  Q2 (a)  •  Q2 (b)  •  Q3  •  Q4  •  Q5 (a)  •  Q5 (b)  •  Q6 (a)  •  Q6 (b)  •  Q7 (a)  •  Q7 (b)  •  Q8  •  

   Other MATH220 Exams

  •  April 2011  •  April 2005  •  December 2011  •  December 2010  •  December 2009  •  

Question 03
For statements P, Q and R, prove that the statement $\displaystyle [(P\Rightarrow Q)\Rightarrow R]\lor (\lnot P\lor Q)$ is a tautology.

Make sure you understand the problem fully: What is the question asking you to do? Are there specific conditions or constraints that you should take note of? How will you know if your answer is correct from your work only? Can you rephrase the question in your own words in a way that makes sense to you?

If you are stuck, check the hints below. Read the first one and consider it for a while. Does it give you a new idea on how to approach the problem? If so, try it! If after a while you are still stuck, go for the next hint.

Hint 1
Use the identity $A\Rightarrow B\quad \equiv \quad \lnot A\lor B$

Hint 2
Use the identity $(A\land B)\lor C\quad \equiv \quad (A\lor C)\land (B\lor C)$

Checking a solution serves two purposes: helping you if, after having used all the hints, you still are stuck on the problem; or if you have solved the problem and would like to check your work. If you are stuck on a problem: Read the solution slowly and as soon as you feel you could finish the problem on your own, hide it and work on the problem. Come back later to the solution if you are stuck or if you want to check your work. If you want to check your work: Don't only focus on the answer, problems are mostly marked for the work you do, make sure you understand all the steps that were required to complete the problem and see if you made mistakes or forgot some aspects. Your goal is to check that your mental process was correct, not only the result.

Solution

Using both hints, we can rewrite the statement into equivalent statements as follow ${\begin{aligned}\left[(P\Rightarrow Q)\Rightarrow R\right]\lor (\lnot P\lor Q)&\equiv [(\lnot P\lor Q)\Rightarrow R]\lor (\lnot P\lor Q)\\&\equiv \lnot (\lnot P\lor Q)\lor R\lor (\lnot P)\lor Q\\&\equiv (P\land \lnot Q)\lor R\lor (\lnot P)\lor Q\\&\equiv [P\lor R\lor (\lnot P)\lor Q]\land [(\lnot Q)\lor R\lor (\lnot P)\lor Q]\end{aligned}}$ The last equivalent statement is of the type A AND B with ${\begin{aligned}A&=P\lor R\lor (\lnot P)\lor Q\\B&=(\lnot Q)\lor R\lor (\lnot P)\lor Q\end{aligned}}$ which both are tautologies since they contain P OR not P and respectively not Q OR Q. So if both A and B are tautologies, then so is the conjunction of them into the statement A AND B.

{{#incat:MER CT flag||

Click here for similar questions

MER QGH flag, MER QGQ flag, MER QGS flag, MER RT flag, MER Tag Logic, Pages using DynamicPageList3 parser function, Pages using DynamicPageList3 parser tag

}}