Found a typo? Is this solution unclear? Let us know here. Please rate my easiness! It's quick and helps everyone guide their studies.
Recall that the th Maclaurin polynomial of a function is

Looking at our function, it is piecewise, with the value at defined separately. The Maclaurin polynomial requires taking derivatives evaluated at , so that means we would need to determine that this function is indeed differentiable at , 2023 times.
Showing that is differentiable 2023 times is a lot of times, but we have to trust that a pattern will emerge. Let's start with the first derivative. All we have is the definition:

To evaluate the limit above, recall that the exponential function grows more rapidly than any polynomial. One way to make this precise is to substitute , so the limit becomes

Computing is the technical computation. Away from , we can compute the derivatives of with the chain and product rules:

Here a pattern is already starting to emerge: the term appears in both derivatives, and it is going to appear in all the derivatives; in fact, it appears as a factor in each summand of every derivative. Once we factor out, the remainder is a quotient of polynomials. In other words, the general form of the derivative of for is:

where and are polynomial functions.
Now we can compute , again using the limit definition of derivative, (but recalling and hoping to reapply the work we already did). Let's start with the second derivative, to warm up.

where and , which we found when we computed the first derivative above. The last step above once again follows from the fact that the exponential function grows faster than any polynomial. One can make the same substitution that we made to compute to rewrite the limit as a limit at infinity that is more familiar:

In general, the scheme of the computation is as follows:

Thus we have that every derivative of evaluated at 0 vanishes, so the 2023rd Maclaurin polynomial is 0.
|