great update and a minor stuff: "\pm" ?

I simply didn't understand it, and frankly I haven't seen people using that for omitting terms for the sine series. Perhaps Stewart wrote it that way? I haven't previewed that section yet. If you think it's right, sure just let it stay. I was thinking if it was a typo and realized it couldn't be, so there was something intentional that I could not catch.

simontse (talk)08:05, 24 February 2013

Feel free to remove it. We should use the notation the students would be most comfortable with. It is just here to indicate the alternating signs of the following terms.

Bernhard Konrad (talk)21:25, 24 February 2013