great update and a minor stuff: "\pm" ?
Hi Christina, thanks for the great update. I love your version more than the previous one. I was about to change sometime but just paused to confirm.
Was it intentional to have a \pm before the omitted terms in the sine expansion?
Hi, the changes are Christina's, the \pm and \mp is from me. What's wrong with it?
I simply didn't understand it, and frankly I haven't seen people using that for omitting terms for the sine series. Perhaps Stewart wrote it that way? I haven't previewed that section yet. If you think it's right, sure just let it stay. I was thinking if it was a typo and realized it couldn't be, so there was something intentional that I could not catch.