Gender Diagnosticity for the Homosexual Community
This is good, could we include in first paragraph not only occupational preferences that distinguish men from women or lesbian women from gay men but also perhaps female heterosexuals compared to female homosexuals and heterosexuals males compared to homosexual males. I'm not sure if that is extending it too much but I thought we were trying to say the purpose of GD scores is important because results from this study are not as reliable if we only compare different genders but to be more specific and find variability between GD score and sexual orientation with question responses for more accurate results.
Also is this the first time GD is mentioned in this page? we may have to for the first time mentioned use the full word ie. Gender Diagnosticity.
I edited my opinions for the second paragraph just some minor grammar suggestions or clean up? but take or leave :)I put in italics what i changed:
People who deviate from socially-constructed, heterosexual gender roles are prone to stigmatization. This stigmatization leads to minority stress, which is the conceptualization of internalized homophobia, stigma, and discrimination (Meyer, 1995, p. 38). Future research could be conducted to examine how GD is related to bullying towards gay and lesbian individuals. Since individuals will differ in their response to bullying, we may go on to investigate how GD affects coping styles in cases of homophobia. One response to homophobia may be concealing one's sexual orientation.(Study Name/Researcher) has found that the majority of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals' stress comes from concealing their sexual orientation. We could look into how GD affects the ways homosexual individuals conceal their sexual orientation.
I think this part is really good but are we now going into bullying or since bullying is already mentioned previously on this page maybe we should focus more on how homosexuals and heterosexuals and their differing GD scores between and within each group can be predictors of future outcomes when combined with their personality traits. This is due to possible different coping mechanisms, lifestyle choices and individual preferences for activites/occupation, etc. (if we do go this way I will look for another reference to support or we can leave as in as the bullying is just an extension of why it is perhaps necessary to look at different groups as it presents possible different life outcomes due to external variables such as bullying and internal variables such as coping mechanisms along with personality traits
While I do think the importance of the bullying issue is worth discussing, I totally agree that we shouldn't go too much into detail, since it's already been explained earlier in the Future Research article.
And! I was trying to write about the internal/external interaction aspect, but couldn't find the words. I think you did a really good job of that, so yes, that would be an excellent point to include in the final write-up. More empirical support is always helpful, but the studies that CalvinChan have mentioned previously may also be sufficient if you want to stay within the realm of coping/stress.
Okay!
So I combined what you have all been saying, Schuolee, CalvinChan and SunnyZheng. Please feel free to take out stuff I have said as it is quite large, I do not think we should add to it though as this future research page is already quite large. I went off of your recent summary Schuolee. I also found a reference to how people concealing a stigma will cause more psychological stress. It wasnt specific to homosexuals but I think it is supporting our argument. I did change the paraphrasing a bit around due to it being a different article so I paraphrased it to this article. After you read over this Schuolee could you post it in the future research page, probably under the paragraph that I posted before where it was leading into our topic. Thanks!
In future studies comparing gender responses to a survey questionnaire we suggest that gender diagnosticity (GD) scores are necessary to combine with personality traits to produce more accurate results for predictors of future outcomes. This is due to possible different coping mechanisms, lifestyle choices and individual preferences for activities/occupation distinguished between not only male and female heterosexuals or male and female homosexuals but also female heterosexuals compared to female homosexuals and male heterosexuals compared to male homosexuals. It is also necessary not to assume that all female heterosexuals will have the same (GD) score or all the male heterosexuals will have the same (GD) scores. Research has supported that focusing on a smaller subgroup, such as homosexuals, presents possible different life outcomes due to external variables such as bullying and internal variables such as coping mechanisms along with personality traits. People who deviate from socially-constructed, heterosexual gender roles are prone to stigmatization. This stigmatization leads to minority stress, which is the conceptualization of internalized homophobia, stigma, and discrimination (Meyer, 1995, p. 38). Future research could be conducted to examine how gender diagnosticity (GD) is related to bullying towards gay and lesbian individuals. Since individuals will differ in their response to bullying, we may go on to investigate how GD affects coping styles in cases of homophobia. One response to homophobia may be concealing one’s sexual orientation. Pachankis (2007) has found that concealing a stigma can cause both negative psychological and physical stress on the individuals. In future research if we included GD scores combined with personality traits we could compare between and within each group possible predictors
Pachankis, J.E. (2007). The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: A cognitive-affective-behavioral model. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 328-345. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.2.328
Sounds awesome! Thanks for making our points more concise and clear. I'm just going to change the last sentence to:
Future research could pair GD scores with personality traits to identify and compare predictors between and within heterosexual and homosexual groups.
Also, do we have a citation for the citation: "(Meyer, 1995, pg. 38)"?
OK I saw that you put it in! it fits perfectly. I'm gona do a read through of the whole page as a final edit. great work! I did not find the reference for (Meyer, 1995, pg.38) I thought that was your reference. Is it not included in the reference page? we may have to take out.
Sorry for the late response. Here are the two sources:
http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/stable/2137286?seq=1&
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2072932/
The first link you must login through your cwl. Hope this helps.