Critiques and Suggestions

Hi Abed,
Here are my suggestions:

1. There are many spelling, grammatical, and punctuation errors, such as “This makes development of pedagogical agents that detect, model and adapt to clues about users emotional states, an area which needs further attention”, “classifiers to for classifying”, or “This papers main contribution”. I believe you need to proofread the page.
2. The referencing system should be revised and terms are better to directly point to a resource or page rather than having the explicit links in front. Also, I would suggest you to present paper references within a reference style, rather than pointing to their Pdf files. For instance, “worked on the OCC model of emotions”
3. New terms such as OCC are better to be defined, and I would suggest you to make these new terms salient, making the page more eye appealing
4. I would suggest you to cite Perkuran; “One of such models is the model by Elliott and Pekrun"
5. "The demo version of the game is open to play which can be found here....[Insert Link]”, etc.
6. Figures are better to be numbered (e.g., Figure 1.)
7. There are dedicated pages for the Bayesian network and Dynamic Bayesian network in Wiki, I believe you should refer to those in the background section or you may add a “builds on” or a “related pages” section.
8. Personally, I found the both reviews to be very detailed and specific. It was sometimes like I was reading the original paper. For instance, the significant test values, kappa, and accuracy measures for each affect are very specific information. The focus is better to be on presenting the overall outcomes.

All above matters aside, I appreciate your effort.

Good job,

Yaashaar

Hi Yaashar, Thank you for the feedback. The problems you mentioned was due lack of time and inability to proofread some of the things. These things are being updated at the moment. Let me know if there is anything that can be done