Critique - Prithu

Hi Abed,

Thanks for the nice write up. It provides a very solid background and then specifies the incremental contributions added by these papers. However here are few suggestions for improvements:

1. The goals are very well described. However in the method and result sections, there are many jargons. It will be good to provide a layman's explanation to some of them to ease the understanding. 2. The figures in the result section are very difficult to read. Particularly the comparison plots, the corresponding legends are very small. 3. There are quite a few typos and grammar errors. The language also needs a major revision. Please do a thorough proof read:

 ". ..... dub it as "MetaTutor is an adaptive ITS designed to encourage students to employ meta- cognitive SRL strategies, while teaching concepts about the human circulatory system". [52]", 52 comes from nowhere
 "They tried predict boredom and curiosity builds on Pekrun's model as mentioned before" --> to missing
 "This papers main work was generating meaningful feature sets from eye-gaze data which has been proved to be correlated to motivation in context of ITSs"--> These
"Thus, the network at time  is informed by the observations made by the network at time " --> are

PrithuBanerjee (talk)‎

Thanks Prithu, I do agree the page needs tuning when it comes to taking care of typos and writing errors. Actually, the page was a bit longer than expected. I will try to take care of the issues. Thanks for pointing out the mistakes.

MDAbedRahman (talk)‎