Editing suggestions

Hi Amy,

The mystery is solved!! I saw your earlier comments and took them into consideration when reworking my page. Because they weren't in a thread, I thought they were the words of the Wiki God. Actually, I thought they might have been the comments of Professor Douglas but this explains so much. I am so glad you like the changes I have made so far.

For the second round of feedback:

  • I agree that “limited validity” and “unlimited validity” are odd. They are the terms used by the author I was citing but I think I might replace them with "... retention" (drawing a blank here) and "permanent retention"
  • I also like your idea of using fuse instead of weld.

Thanks so much for your comments. Good luck with your assignments!

SarahGiesbrecht (talk)23:44, 9 April 2015

Not the Wiki Gods, just the Wiki inept. I wish I'd caught that sooner.

Thanks so much for your encouragement and last editing suggestions. Especially the rewording you suggest for introducing the Upward & McKemmish citation. I agree, that's much clearer!

AmySpooner (talk)05:30, 10 April 2015