Talk:GRSJ224/ElectoralReform

From UBC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Suggestion for your topic 006:54, 28 July 2018
Electoral Reform comments007:37, 24 July 2018
Great Topic021:46, 23 July 2018

Suggestion for your topic

I think what you have is very interesting and informative. I think you should maybe relabel your title to “Electoral Reform in Canada” since you currently seem to be focusing on Canada. Also, you have Canada as your example as a first past the post system, and I think it would be useful to also have a specific example of a country with proportional representation and how that impacts their government/society. Also, I think it makes more sense to use “Benefits” instead of “Positives” in your sub-section headings.

JustineSultan (talk)06:54, 28 July 2018

Electoral Reform comments

Your topic is really interesting.It would lead to a lot of discussions in the society. I think both the positives of Single Member Plurality and Proportional Representation requires more explanation. And the summary of the electoral reform also need some more details. You did a great job on using the references to aid your work. Keep up the great work!

JinHungLui (talk)07:37, 24 July 2018

Great Topic

Love your topic and I think it is especially important to discuss now but I think you may need to expand on how proportional representation works a little more and maybe use a picture since proportional representation can be a bit complicated at first. Other than that I think it is a great article

KaitlynMcHardy (talk)21:46, 23 July 2018