Course talk:CPSC522/Multi-Agent Systems

* The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds): 4
* The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand: 5
* The abstract is a concise and clear summary: 5
* There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear: 5
* There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code:  3 (Although there wasn't pseudocode, given what you covered it wasn't really needed. Could be helpful if the page is expanded though.)
* It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic): 5
* It is correct: 5
* It was neither too short nor too long for the topic: 3 ( you may want to complete the incomplete parts) 
* It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page):  5 
* It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki: 4
* The references and links to external pages are well chosen: 5
* I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic: 4
* This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate: 4

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 18

I'm struggling to come up with stuff to critique here! Longer walkthrough-style example(s) showing how the theory can be applied in a CS context could be useful.

Formatting error (?): "[perfect rationality] or [bounded rationality]". Maybe you were going for italics? Link error: prisoner's dilema

"The debate on the future of agent-based AI research has... become part of the public debate" (public discourse?)

• The topic is relevant for the course. 5
• The writing is clear and the English is good. 5
• The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5 - great overviews with reasonable examples
• The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5 - what's there is well chosen
• The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5
• There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 5 - great examples
• There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 0 (NA?) - you could always throw some pseudocode in for one of the examples, but it's not sorely missed
• It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5
• It is correct. 5
• It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 4.5 - solid overview without getting too bogged down in specifics, but slightly on the long side
• It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5
• It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5 - you actually found some relevant stuff to link!
• The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 5 - good job on this
• I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 5 - I actually would
• This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 5

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 19.4

You lost 0.1 for the broken link :P

If I were to grade I would give it: On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree" please rate and comment on the following:

The topic is relevant for the course. 5

The writing is clear and the English is good. 5

The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5

The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5

The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5

There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 5

There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. N/A

It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5

It is correct. 5

It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 4: May be a little long; I feel the Game Theory section could be condensed and only highlight concepts are directly relevant to topic

It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5

It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5

The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 4: I would include more CS-centred material esp regarding how multi-agent systems are used in developing AI, since this is a wiki page for CS students. And perhaps some note/examples on systems science?

I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 4: see above

This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4.5: It's pretty good

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 18

Other comments:

• Related to page links should be in a sentence: per instructions.