Critique

I'm struggling to come up with stuff to critique here! Longer walkthrough-style example(s) showing how the theory can be applied in a CS context could be useful.

Formatting error (?): "[perfect rationality] or [bounded rationality]". Maybe you were going for italics? Link error: prisoner's dilema

"The debate on the future of agent-based AI research has... become part of the public debate" (public discourse?)

• The topic is relevant for the course. 5
• The writing is clear and the English is good. 5
• The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5 - great overviews with reasonable examples
• The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5 - what's there is well chosen
• The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5
• There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 5 - great examples
• There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 0 (NA?) - you could always throw some pseudocode in for one of the examples, but it's not sorely missed
• It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5
• It is correct. 5
• It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 4.5 - solid overview without getting too bogged down in specifics, but slightly on the long side
• It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5
• It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5 - you actually found some relevant stuff to link!
• The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 5 - good job on this
• I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 5 - I actually would
• This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 5

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 19.4

You lost 0.1 for the broken link :P