Critique

If I were to grade I would give it: On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree" please rate and comment on the following:

The topic is relevant for the course. 5

The writing is clear and the English is good. 5

The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5

The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5

The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5

There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 5

There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. N/A

It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5

It is correct. 5

It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 4: May be a little long; I feel the Game Theory section could be condensed and only highlight concepts are directly relevant to topic

It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5

It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5

The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 4: I would include more CS-centred material esp regarding how multi-agent systems are used in developing AI, since this is a wiki page for CS students. And perhaps some note/examples on systems science?

I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 4: see above

This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4.5: It's pretty good

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 18

Other comments:

• Related to page links should be in a sentence: per instructions.