| APBI 402 / SOIL 502|
Sustainable Soil Management
|Instructors:|| Maja Krzic |
|Class schedule:|| Friday 1-2pm (Lecture) |
Monday 3-5pm (Tutorial)
|Classroom:|| Friday OC 3018 |
Monday OC 3018
|* Syllabus||* Schedule|
|* PBL Case||* Final Exams|
- Shannon Berch, BC Min. Envionment, Victoria. firstname.lastname@example.org
- Mike van Ham, SYLVIS, New Westminster, email@example.com
- Art Bomke, MCML 233, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Cindy Prescott, FSC 3037, email@example.com
- Sue Grayston, FSC 3006, firstname.lastname@example.org
Sean and Sandra are the appropriate contact persons regarding the general conduct of the course and some of the cases. Drs. Berch, Bomke, Prescott, Grayston and Mr. Van Ham prepared one case each and will be contributing their expertise during that specific unit of the course.
- 1 Course Description
- 2 Learning Outcomes
- 3 Course Format
- 4 Course Marks
- 5 Course Outline
- 6 General References
- 7 Course Schedule
- 8 Group Presentations: Components & Judging Criteria
- 9 Case Report: Writing Tips & Grading Criteria
- 10 Problem-Based Learning Cases
Application of fundamental, unifying, soil science principles in sustainable management of forested, agricultural, and urban or constructed ecosystems.
Upon completion of APBI 402/SOIL 502, students will be able to:
- Describe processes of soil genesis, recognize diagnostic features of natural soils, and relate management practices to information available in soil survey reports.
- Utilize physical, chemical, and biological soil quality indicators to assess sustainability of land management practices.
- Characterize the soil chemical environment and its modification to enhance plant, animal, and human health.
- Specific topics may include: liming, fertilization, and remediation of chemical contamination
- Describe the soil biological processes with regard to nutrient cycling and management of organic inputs.
- Specific topics may include: maintenance of soil organic matter, carbon sequestration, and recycling of various organic materials such as manures biosolids, and green manures.
- Describe the soil physical environment and its manipulation and/or degradation in ecosystem management.
- Specific topics may include: compaction, trafficability, water management, soil erosion
- Discuss the relationship of soil management to government and private sector policies.
- Specific topics may include Forest Practice Code, urban development regulation, right to farm and farmland preservation legislation, environmental farm planning, and land reclamation legislation
- APBI 402 is run in conjunction with SOIL 502, with students enrolled in both courses participating in a modified problem-based learning (PBL) environment to meet the course learning outcomes listed above.
- The course learning outcomes will be met through three case studies, each four weeks in duration. Groups of 4-6 students will be assigned either a forestry, urban, or agricultural land management regime in which to pursue the case study learning outcomes. Each case will conclude with seminars from each group to enable a comparison of approaches within different land uses. Individual students will prepare 1,000 word reports summarizing their own personal learning for each case. Groups will be organized to facilitate interdisciplinary discussion and to provide opportunities for students from different programs to benefit from their varied experience and educational backgrounds. Class meetings each week shall consist of a 1-hour lecture and 2-hour discussion/PBL group activity.
- There is no textbook for the course; background readings will be drawn from a variety of sources. Student assessment will be on the basis of a final examination, group presentations, individual student case reports, and a small component to recognize class participation.
| APBI 402
Sustainable Soil Management
| SOIL 502
Advanced Sustainable Soil Management
|Final exam||35%||Final exam||35%|
|Case reports by individuals (3)(See a)||39%||Case reports by individuals (3)(See a)||30%|
|Case seminars by groups (3)(See b)||21%||Case seminars by groups (3)(See b)||21%|
|Term paper (1)(See c)||9%|
|Class participation (See d)||5%||Class participation (See d)||5%|
|Bonus mark (See e)||+/- 2%||Bonus mark (See e)||+/- 2%|
a Written case reports of 1,000 words will be prepared by individual students and will be due a week after the group presentations. Written case reports will be assessed on the basis of content and quality of writing (for more details see section on “Case Report-Writing Tips” shown at the end of this syllabus). Content of the individual case reports should demonstrate that the student has achieved the case learning outcomes and is able to discuss them in the context of the case scenario. Also, in 1-2 paragraphs each student should compare (relate) learning outcomes of his/her case to the cases presented by other groups. All reports should be handed in on time and 10% mark subtraction will be made for each day being late. Late term papers, passed day 7 will not be accepted.
b Group presentations will be judged based on content, structure, and delivery. More detailed criteria for group presentations are given at the end of the course syllabus.
c Term paper for SOIL 502 students of approximately 1,500 words on a soil management topic to be negotiated and approved by the course instructors. For more information check SOIL 502 term paper info file
d Class participation will be assessed on the basis of contribution to in-class (verbal) and online (written) discussions.
e Bonus points of +/-2% will be awarded for attending annual workshop of the Pacific Regional Society of Soil Science (PRSSS) to be held at UBC in March. The attendance is mandatory and 2% will be deducted if students choose not to attend. Up to 2% will be awarded for ~500 word synopsis of the workshop written from the student’s perspective and suitable for publication in the PRSSS Newsletter.
===It is highly recommended that students attend SOIL 500 – Soil Science seminar (every Friday at 3-4 pm, MCML154) since most seminar topics will be complementary to what we are covering in this course.
Course Introduction - Week 1
General concept of soil quality and sustainable land management.
Case 1 - Weeks 1 through 5
Case specific learning outcome: Describe soil physical environment and its manipulation and/or degradation in ecosystem management.
- Forestry: Impacts of mechanical disturbance on soil quality on forest landings.
- Agriculture: Cattle grazing impacts on soil quality on grasslands.
- Regional Development: Soil erosion in the middle mountains of Nepal.
Case 2 - Weeks 5 through 9
Case specific learning outcome: Characterize the soil chemical environment and its modification to enhance plant, animal, and human health.
- Forestry: Salal Cedar Hemlock Integrated Research Program (SCHIRP)
- Agriculture: Soil testing as a tool for monitoring soil quality; the UBC Farm case.
- Managed: Fabricated soil mixtures used as a cover for Vancouver Landfill
- Urban: Re-grounding in Riley Park
Case 3 - Weeks 9 through 13
Case specific learning outcome: Describe soil biological processes and application to nutrient cycling and management of organic inputs.
- Forestry: Soil fauna on the long-term soil productivity (LTSP) sites in BC.
- Forestry: Effects of variable retention harvesting on soil microbial communities in coastal BC forests.
- Agriculture: Soil mesofauna on grazed rangelands in BC.
PRSSS Spring workshop
Students are strongly encouraged to attend the Pacific Regional Soil Science Society workshop in spring 2018
Details and registration information can be found on the PRSSS website: http://prsss.landfood.ubc.ca/springworkshop/
2% bonus marks are available for students who submit a short summary of the workshop; the best summary will be printed in an upcoming version of the PRSSS newsletter. Summaries should be submitted to connect prior to the end of term.
- Brady N.C., and R.R. Weil. 2010. Elements of the nature and properties of soils (3rd ed.). Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 624 pp.
- Craul, P.J. 1999. Urban soils: applications and practices. Wiley, New York. NY.
- Doran, J.W. and A.J. Jones. 1996. Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. SSSA Special Publication Number 49.SSSA. Madison, WI. 410 pp.
- Edwards, C.A. 2004. Earthworm ecology (2nd ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton. FL. 456 pp.
- Fisher, R.F. and D. Binkley. 2000. Ecology and management of forest soils (3rd ed.). John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York. 489 pp.
- Krzic, M., T. Naughler, S. Dyanatkar, and C. Crowley. 2010. Virtual Soil Lab Modules. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver. http://soilweb.landfood.ubc.ca/labmodules/
- Krzic, M., K. Wiseman, L. Dampier, S. Grand, J. Wilson, and D. Gaumont-Guay. 2013. SoilWeb200: An Online Educational Tool for the APBI 200 course: Introduction to Soil Science. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver http://soilweb200.landfood.ubc.ca
- Magdoff, F.R. and R.R. Weil. 2004. Soil organic matter in sustainable agriculture. CRC Press, Boca Faton, FL. 416 pp.
- Tisdale, S.L., W.L. Nelson, J.D. Beaton, and J. Havlin. 1999. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. Collier-Macmillan.
Group Presentations: Components & Judging Criteria
Group presentations will be judged based on content (60%), structure (30%), and delivery (10%).
- Content was presented in a clear and concise manner.
a. Explains theory and potentially complex material clearly (e.g., no jargon or jargon is explained).
b. There was sufficient detail for an out-of-field observer to follow the presentation.
- Objective for your case study was clearly articulated.
- Provide explanation on how were data collected (e.g., study sites and management treatments are described, differences among soil types are explained).
- Explain the key findings of your study case (e.g., summary of main points, suggestions for future research/directions, thought-provoking comments on where do we go from here).
- At the end of your presentation, post 2 questions about the most relevant findings of your case.
- The presentation started in a manner that captured the audience’s interest and was relevant to the body of the presentation.
- The points were presented in a logical manner.
- The presentation is closed in a manner that links key findings to the study case’s objective.
- Length (kept to allotted time).
- The students’ presentation kept the audience’s interest and engaged the interest and participation of the other groups.
- Audio-visual aides were used in a manner that supported the presentation.
- Speech: projected well (everyone could hear), presenters did not speak too quickly.
- Handled questions well (if did not understand question paraphrased back to the questioner, demonstrated critical thinking if answer is not immediately obvious, makes an educated guess, if does not know the answer says so, shows confidence in ability to answer questions).
Case Report: Writing Tips & Grading Criteria
Word limit of 1,000 words does not include tables, figures, list of references, cover page, and appendix (assuming that you decide to include an appendix in your paper). -Tips on how to approach preparing the case report:
- Before you start writing the report, make an outline and identify the key sub-sections.
- During the writing process, refer frequently to the learning outcomes to keep yourself on track.
- Before you submit the paper, make sure that it is correct, clear, concise, consistent, and complete (so-called 5 Cs of communication).
- Provide background information on the study site(s) and management practices (or treatments if your case is done on an experimental field) as well as soil type, climate, topography, parent material, and type of vegetation on the study site(s). Soil type should be discussed regarding its natural advantages and disadvantages for a specific management practice.
- Outline study objective(s).
- Develop a soil quality framework [Function -- Process -- Attribute (Property) -- Indicator] and justify selection of indicators focusing on the management practice of your case study.
- Discuss key data of your case study, ensuring that you address both data trends and connections among different groups of data.
- Briefly summarize the body of your report and restate your argument. Always remember to check do your conclusions match the study objective(s).
- Use logical structure appropriate to report’s topic.
- Provide background information on case setup (e.g., study treatments, soil, climate) and integrate it with data discussion.
Comparison to Other Cases (30%)
In 1-2 paragraphs, compare and/or relate key findings of your case to the cases presented by other groups. Focus on the soil function, processes and properties (indicators), avoiding any elaboration of different management practices used in different case studies. Consider developing a table highlighting similarities and differences between cases.
Grammar and Writing Style (10%)
•Ensure that your report is free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors.
•Keep your sentences simple. That does not necessarily mean that your thoughts are simple. Complex and adjective-laden sentences just make your great ideas hard to follow.
•Each paragraph should contain one main idea. Paragraphs should be logically organized. For example, you should discuss ideas in the order in which they appear in your introduction.
•As a university student, you are expected to submit original work and give credit to other peoples' ideas; hence, plagiarism will not be tolerated. If you are unclear on the concept, please see http://learningcommons.ubc.ca/resource-guides/avoid-plagiarism/
•Professional Communications Handbook by Garland and Shackleton http://lfs-lc-collabtm.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2013/11/professional.communication.handbook.pdf