User talk:RileyKoenig

I don't see any problem with the layout or the content - I think it is both informative and clear. Just make sure that you don't go over the word limit when you write it.
You should (and probably would) include:

• Introduction (What is a diffuser?)
• Diagrams / images (I think an image showing diffusers in studio rooms or concert halls would be great)
  

I think section headings are preferrably a word or simple sentences for wiki pages, so maybe re-think about your headings?

• I would probably remove the colon : after the characteristics heading
• Maybe use a subheading: characteristics --> and then use subsubheadings Good diffuser / Bad diffuser?
• Also, maybe use subheading: issues with absorption --> and then use subsubheadings design / materials?
• I think you should avoid siting sources on your subheading. Instead, I think it would be better if you site it after the first sentence of your section "Does the diffusers design cause bad absorption?"
  

Check your sources! I think some information in "characteristics of a bad diffuser" may need siting. I am assuming the information in section "Does the diffusers design cause bad absorption?" are all from the same reference ([6])... which then wouldn't be a problem.

Overall I think the content and data are all great. Just watch your word limit and make sure to include the introduction and diagrams! :D