User talk:ConnorWatson
- [View source↑]
- [History↑]
Contents
Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
---|---|---|
Change URL | 0 | 19:20, 6 April 2017 |
Peer review | 1 | 17:56, 27 March 2017 |
Your URL should be:
Course:PHYS341/Relation between music and colour
not
Course:PHYS 341 - Relation between music and colour
Now UBC wiki thinks "PHYS 341 - Relation between music and colour" is a course distinct from "PHYS341".
CEW
- How does Garner's theory relate to synesthesia? - Are the frequencies of Garner's theory applicable to people with synesthesia? - Is it synonymous with synesthesia? - Is it possible to replicate what certain people see/hear for people who cannot see colours?
- having a chart of some sort where certain colours correspond to certain notes of the western scale would be helpful in visualizing - maybe talk about the history of certain musicians who could see colour? eg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_with_synesthesia may be of help
I don't feel a sense of certainty in this topic. What you have now seems to not have definitive results of what your title is describing. Seems too general
The article is good, very complete and succinct. The tone is objective and clear, as Chris had insisted.
Although it would perhaps not be necessary for an ordinary wiki, for the purposes of this course it might be useful to include more information on the physics of the quality/variations of brass. It looks like you're getting there with the unfinished portion of the article.
"Trumpet, trombone - cylindrical bore Horn, Tuba, Euphonium - conical bore
Cylindrical bore = brighter, more piercing sound Conical bore = mellower, warming sound"
That portion of the article is a bit awkward and bare bones for the format of a wiki.
if you can find it, a sound clip or video demonstrating the different tones would be a nice addition.