Spatial Comparison

Hi team,

Please check out our Canvas discussion to give your emails for our Google doc :) If we don't hear from you by 10:00pm, Paulina and I will assign you the remaining responsibilities and submit our outline. Hope you are well!

Nyshaya

Hi! Stephanie and I have made a list of things to do (when it was just us) so I'll post it below and we can go over who is doing what and add to it. My email is emmaavey@rocketmail.com. Let me know what you think.

-Brief intro - talk about what buildings were examined (location), time, date. -Create graph for spacial comparison (this year (2020, class data)) -Ethnography and sorting data -Write about findings for ethnography and sorting -General overview of who is good and who is not - really good and really bad -Descriptive stats - just a general overview of the mean, average and significant results. -Discussion portion - overview of findings and differences across campus locations -Why we noticed differences in the sorting and ethnography results. -Outline the significance of these findings ( why it matters that the buildings are different) -Compiling the ethnography and sorting data General editing (spelling and grammar)

Hey my email is stephpratt29@gmail.com

I added the portion on Wiki that I am including:

1. Brief intro - talk about what buildings were examined (location), time, date. 2. Create graph for spatial comparison (this year (2020, class data)) a. Ethnography and sorting data bar graphs and geographical data (google maps- sorting data) 3. Write about findings for ethnography and sorting a. General overview of who is good and who is not - really good and really bad

I have added the majority of my portion to the above thread and the main Wiki page.

my email is stephpratt29@gmail. com I just saw this.

Lindsay suggested that we must communicate the edits and everything in the discussion thread in Wiki and doing edits on the main Wiki page and NOT a google doc.

I and Emily have assigned and added our own roles and responsibility we can maybe FaceTime or chat to better communicate and make sure we get the work done.

Please provide you Skype name by the end of TONIGHT please.

Stephanie

Make sure to use the built in formatting for sub headings or sub sub headings. Do not use underline, italics, bold, etc to indicate headings.

Feedback on the outline has been left in the comments of the assignment.

Please try to make the figure bigger (make a higher res version available) and then coordinate with the other teams on Figure labels/captions in terms of formatting, conventions, usage, etc.). It is hard to read the labels on the chart right now....

Hello Lindsay,

should I increase the resolution of the graphs or redo them?

STephanie

i think just the resolution is good.

Hello Lindsay in your last email you mentioned that we had to provide a short description of what we did.

Where do we put that?

I did the whole Analysis section and graphs except for Figure 1 graph which was done by Emily A.

Thanks,

Stephanie

the wiki is tracking it. you do not need to write a description.

Hi there! I am in the types of objects group. I saw you already wrote your section of the lead-in. I will write mine at the end to keep them in order.

Hey there Spatial Comparison group I am in the Types of Objects section!

I just wanted to suggested since there are a few different groups with pictures I was hoping we could make them more cohesive! So lets try and monitor if anyone else adds more images so we can decide who should label their pictures Figure 1, 2, and so on depending on where your image falls on the wiki. I also am thinking that once that is established we put the description directly under our image with the figure number first BOLDED, EXAMPLE --> Figure 1: **insert description**

Steps to do this: -Click Edit so you can edit anywhere --> Find picture click on it --> Click EDIT --> Go to add description --> Type caption --> Save changes

NOTE: my group has our images labeled figure 3-8 but we will change them to the correct if more images are added! You can also look at our section to see what i am suggesting we all do with our images!

If you have any other suggestion, questions or thoughts feel free to comment they are of course welcome! :)

Thanks so much, and GREAT WORK so far!

Hey guys! I'm from the Sorting Efficacy group and I just had a suggestion for the images. If you go into the Wikitext editor (instead of using the visual editor) and move the text entries for all the images up to the spot between your section title and the 'introduction' sub-heading, and have all your image data up there, it'll then bring all your figures further up your page so that they aren't going into our section as much. All your figures will stay in the same alignment, but they'll start at the top of your section instead of lower down in the analysis. :) Not meaning to step on any toes, just a friendly suggestion to get the Wiki looking as neat and cohesive as possible.

You could also solve the problem by doubling up on your figures and having some running on the left and right side simultaneously, like my own section and others have done. :)

I'm from the Sorting Efficacy group as well. I tried to move our section down to give you more space but the changes are not saving. So as Caitlin has suggested can you please make the changes on your end and perhaps have your visuals embedded within the text like we and the Sorting Efficacy group have done. Thank you!

Hello Spatial Comparison team and Sorting Efficacy group,

Just to keep everyone in the loop, I noticed that one our graphs was not numbered, so I made it 'Figure 3' in order for the images to go in chronological order. What was previously 'Figure 3' is now 'Figure 4.' Not to worry, I made sure to change this in the writing as well.

Sorting Efficacy group, I think your suggestions to move some of our images to the left is a great idea. I've been working at it for some time now, and I can't seem to figure out how to move them. I will try my best to figure it out.

Nyshaya

Don't sweat it! There's definitely a learning curve involved in this and I've struggled with it too. That being said, in the morning I am more than happy to help you sort this out and send you some screenshots and instructions with what I figured out in my own section. :)

spatial comparison team, you have a bold subheading in your section. Please unbold it as it is adding weirdness to the Table of Contents.

good teamwork and cross-team work!

Also, I noticed there are parts where the text is severely squished by the figures on either side, please try to adjust that as visually it is difficult to read when words are so sandwiched between figures.