Critique

I think you did well in picking a pretty interesting topic. Your page seemed quite clearly written and your images were well chosen. The introduction was well written and you did a good job motivating the topic. It seems clear that you probably intend to expand on this page a bit more which will definitely help, as the descriptions of the papers are currently a bit too short for me to really get a handle on what's happening. It would also help to expand on the region proposal network section as well, or at least link to some further reading on the section maybe. There are also a few minor grammar/editing fixes. For instance, I think the images for Fig 1 and 2 should be flipped, and the references in the text to "authors of paper 1" should probably be filled in with the actual author names and paper name.

On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree" please rate and comment on the following:

 The topic is relevant for the course. 5
 The writing is clear and the English is good. 5
 The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 4
 The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5
 The abstract is a concise and clear summary. N/A (not finished)
 There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 2 (Could hopefully expand on things like the region proposal network section with some examples)
 There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. N/A
 It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 4
 It is correct. 5
 It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 2 (but it seems obvious you're intending to expand it)
 It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5
 It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 4
 The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 3
 I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 4
 This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 3

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 15

DavidJohnson (talk)03:57, 14 March 2018