5-t should be 5+t

Thanks guys! I've made the corrections and added the details Bernhard asked. Let me know.

David Kohler (talk)18:46, 7 October 2012

Thanks for adding this additional line. In the last step, when adding L2+L3 we would now get [0,0,t,-1], not [0,0,-1+t,-1], so that again the solutions needs to be adjusted! In fact, I would also like to see how you get back from the reduced matrix to the linear system to conclude consistency (x3 equation is enough).

Bernhard Konrad (talk)20:06, 7 October 2012
 

Wow! I need to watch out that code a bit more closely. Thanks for your carful work!

I've corrected the solution and added the line you asked. (I also checked in wolfram alpha and the solution is now correct)

David Kohler (talk)18:05, 8 October 2012