Topic Scope

Karlson, I couldn't agree more. I think it's important that our questions get at the point of finding out not only what the Canadian government thinks now but also if I has affected how they would feel about things in the future. We're getting close to our deadline already so coming up with these questions is becoming very important. I'm going to create a separate thread where just our questions can be put. That way we can just cut and paste them for our final questions, while having a forum, if need be, to discuss and manipulate our questions.

Karli: I like your idea of broadening out our ideas. Basically, having one central theme upon which other themes hang off would be sweet but we only have 5 questions. I just don't think it's possible to get all those themes in just 5 questions. While I'm not saying it's impossible, it might just be tough. It is for that really that I really think anything that strays away from Afghanistan directly would be tough.

Karlson: You make a very valid point. Since Canada has since withdrawn from their military obligations in Afghanistan, we can now question the current public opinion of Canada's role in Afghanistan etc. Foreign policy may be too broad and there is unreliable evidence or fluctuation in public opinion about this particular issue. A more focus and refined way of gathering statistical evidence and public opinion could be elements of:

-How best can Canada continue to play a useful role in Afghanistan and the region?

-What are Canada's national interests in Afghanistan eight years after the 9/11 attacks? (This is broad but it also ignites where we can make statistical analysis)

-How can Canada improve the distribution and effectiveness of their military aid after their long-running presence in the Afghan war?

Finer tuning needs to result, however we can most likely make a more eloquent and narrowed approach as there has since been significant change of the war and Public Opinion/Canada's role