Suggestions

Hi, Ritika,

Wonderful draft! Lots of examples and detailed explanation make it easy to understand the algorithm. Here are my scores, with some suggestions below that. Scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree:

• (5) The topic is relevant for the course.
• (4) The writing is clear and the English is good.
• (5) The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds).
• (4) The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand.
• (4) The abstract is a concise and clear summary.
• (4) There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.
• (n) There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code.
• (4) It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic).
• (4.5) It is correct.
• (4) It was neither too short nor too long for the topic.
• (4) It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page).
• (3.5) It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki.
• (3.5) The references and links to external pages are well chosen.
• (4) I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic.
• (3.5) This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate.

Suggestions:

• 1.It is better to add math tag to variables that in the paragraph.
• 2.Abstract can be more concise. Maybe put some contents in other sections.
• 3. It is better to give some pseudo code for the the algorithm.

Sincerely,

YuYan

Thank you for your comments YuYan. I shall try to incorporate your suggestions in improving my page. Thanks and regards, Ritika