Critique 2

An Interesting article covering text summarization. Here are some of the suggestions to improve the page:

1. Words like concept counting and topic signatures may need further explanations or hyperlinks.
2. Some of the symbols used in the equations are not explained (BD, BP, D, P).
3. Some of the sentences need restructuring. I suggest Grammarly, to correct minor errors.

• The topic is relevant for the course. 5
• The writing is clear and the English is good. 4
• The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5
• The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 4
• The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5
• There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 4
• There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 4
• It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference, and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5
• It is correct. 5
• It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 5
• It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5
• It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5
• The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 4
• I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 4
• This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 17

Hi Kevin,

Thanks for the feedback. I have updated my Wiki page based on your three suggestions. Hopefully, now it will be easier to read for any new reader.