Critique

Hi Mehrdad,

Nice work! Your page is very well written and informative. I have a few suggestions:

You page could focus more on the part of function approximation and avoid overlapping content since there is a separate page on RL.
You could talk a bit more about the relative merits of RL with Function approximation compared to RL with a Look-up-table.
The presentation of the page can be improved by using latex commands instead of using images for mathematical constructs.

Scores:

[5] The topic is relevant for the course.
[5] The writing is clear and the English is good.
[5] The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds).
[5] The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand.
[5] The abstract is a concise and clear summary.
[4] There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.
[3] There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code.
[5] It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic).
[5] It is correct.
[4] It was neither too short nor too long for the topic.
[5] It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page).
[5] It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki.
[5] The references and links to external pages are well chosen.
[4] I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic.
[4] This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate.

Thanks for your feedback Adnan, will I did add some Pseudo code after your comments.