Comments and critique

Hi Ricky,

Firstly, let me thank for your project and your contribution in CPSC 522 Wiki pages. I like your page and find your topic of project interesting. I like to share my opinion and give you my comments, maybe they might help you.

1) First of you can treat this assignment's wiki page as a research paper and include the usual and common sections such as: abstract, motivation, introduction, method, evaluation, results, conclusion, future work and acknowledgment. 2) Some of the links must make maybe a single word as the clickable blue pointer, but in some parts of your page there is a long blue link which looks a bit unusual 3) Finally, as I mentioned in the first point above, there must be subsections such as conclusion or results or data, so when a reader wants to just look at a specific aspect of the page, be able to do so as efficient as possible.

Thanks for your page it was a pleasure to read it and I hope these comments can help you improve your contribution.

Mehrdad Ghomi

Hey Mehrdad,

1) Which section is missing? I currently have the following:

1 Hypothesis 2 Abstract 3 Method Descriptions 4 Experiments 5 Analysis 6 References

Given the structure of my hypothesis, I simply put the conclusion into the analysis section. I can add a future work section though.

2) What are the "some parts"? I found one long hyperlink and changed it to a reference, but I couldn't find any others. Thanks!

3) What subsections are missing? The results are big PNG images, and the data is available for reproducing the results. All the links are in the table of contents..