Critique

It was an interesting topic! Though i found some minor shortcomings, which are listed below:

• Grammatical mistakes and abstract sentences were found.
• Perhaps also give links of papers in the beginning, so that its easy for the user to read.
• I found that not much detail was presented from paper 2.
• Also, i didn't find any formalism or equations in the article, was it because there was none in the papers you discussed.

I a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree" please rate and comment on the following:

• The topic is relevant for the course. -5
• The writing is clear and the English is good.- 4
• The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds).-4
• The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand.-4
• The abstract is a concise and clear summary.-5
• There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.-4
• There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. -4
• It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). -5
• It is correct. -5
• It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. -4
• It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). -5
• It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. -5
• The references and links to external pages are well chosen.-5
• I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. -5
• This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate.-4

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 16