Feedback(J0)
I just skimmed through, (not an accurate feedback). Lack of formalism was the main problem I noticed, that is most of the article is written in words though that might be because of the nature of the topic. Lack of examples and figures is also noticeable but probably not the main problem. The key concepts explained can be considered as the formal contribution.
Since I didn't put enough time to go into the details I can't go too low if I want to score. But the actual quality can be higher or lower.
I think you are right in that I have this "flow" in my mind: concept formation --> formalism --> elaboration or revision. The part of the topic I am interested in is so-called conceptualization and how it leads to formalism. So, I am not starting in the second stage. Also, it might be said that generally we express our thoughts in words; we need natural languages :)