Jump to: navigation, search

On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree"

  • The topic is relevant for the course - 5
  • The writing is clear and the English is good - 4 (The Abstract is not coherent. Could rephrase it.)
  • The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds) - 5
  • The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand - 5
  • The abstract is a concise and clear summary - 5
  • There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear - 5
  • There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code - 3 (Could add details of a few NLP algorithms)
  • It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). - 2 (Not covered. Need to give a few details about each one)
  • It is correct - 5
  • It was neither too short nor too long for the topic - 3 (A bit Short. Could expand on different language models (character/word) and Word2vec)
  • It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page) - 3
  • It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki - 4 (Doesn't currently)
  • The references and links to external pages are well chosen - 5
  • I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic - 4
  • This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate - 4

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 15

23:02, 5 February 2018