Critique 1.

Good article, interesting topic. Introduction motivates the problem well. Don't have much to remark on, looks good. There's a double as somewhere in there ("as as"), but didn't find anything else. Link to code? Or links to related work would be interesting.

The topic is relevant for the course. 5 The writing is clear and the English is good. 5 The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5 The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. - The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5 There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 3 There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 3 It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 3 It is correct. 5 It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 4 It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5 It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5 The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 3 I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 4 This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4 If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 18