Critique

Cool topic. Abstract and related works can be added. A more detailed background information can help the reader. The future work sections is interesting. You should also add a few references and internal wiki links.

  • The topic is relevant for the course. 5
  • The writing is clear and the English is good. 5
  • The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 4
  • The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 4
  • The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 0
  • There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 3 specific examples where the system could be useful?
  • There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 0
  • It is correct. 3 I think some more detail is needed
  • It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 3 a bit short
  • It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5
  • It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 4
  • The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 0
  • I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 3
  • This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 3

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 15

BornaGhotbi (talk)13:46, 23 April 2018