Critique

Very interesting topic. It seems like you probably intend to add to the page still, which will probably help clarify a bit more things like your approach and some more analysis of your results, etc. I'll be looking forward to checking out the final version of your page!

   The topic is relevant for the course. 5
   The writing is clear and the English is good. 5
   The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5
   The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. N/A
   The abstract is a concise and clear summary. N/A
   There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 3 (The pictures helped with this a bit, but it would be good to expand on a few examples)
   There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. N/A
   It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). N/A
   It is correct. 5 
   It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 3 (It's a little short so far, but it seems obvious you intend to expand it a bit before the final version)
   It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5
   It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. N/A
   The references and links to external pages are well chosen. N/A
   I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 4 (I think it's a good start, but it might help to expand a bit as well)
   This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4 (As mentioned, I think it's a good start but being expanded a bit will help a lot)

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 17