Feedback
Hi Ainaz,
I think you have chosen an interesting topic for your Wiki page but after reading it i found some things which could be improved upon:
- I did not feel motivated enough as to why i should learn probabilistic models with complete data.
- Also i thought that the content of the page is very less i.e. some concepts like conditional probabilities and probability density functions were very obscure. Thus, i was not able to understand them.
- Also i found that some topics at the bottom of the page are left without any explanation. I think you should work on it to complete a basic Wiki page.
The organization of the content was also not up to the mark. The heading the subheading in the content section are difficult to follow and understand.
I a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree" please rate and comment on the following:
- The topic is relevant for the course. - 5
- The writing is clear and the English is good. - 4.5
- The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). - 4
- The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. - 4
- The abstract is a concise and clear summary. - 4
- There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. - 3.5
- There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. - 4
- It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). - 4
- It is correct. - 5
- It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. - 3
- It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). - 5
- It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. - 2
- The references and links to external pages are well chosen. - 2
- I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. - 4
- This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. - 3
If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 13
EktaAggarwal (talk)