Feedback

Hi Ainaz,

I think you have chosen an interesting topic for your Wiki page but after reading it i found some things which could be improved upon:

  • I did not feel motivated enough as to why i should learn probabilistic models with complete data.
  • Also i thought that the content of the page is very less i.e. some concepts like conditional probabilities and probability density functions were very obscure. Thus, i was not able to understand them.
  • Also i found that some topics at the bottom of the page are left without any explanation. I think you should work on it to complete a basic Wiki page.

The organization of the content was also not up to the mark. The heading the subheading in the content section are difficult to follow and understand.

I a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree" please rate and comment on the following:

  • The topic is relevant for the course. - 5
  • The writing is clear and the English is good. - 4.5
  • The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). - 4
  • The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. - 4
  • The abstract is a concise and clear summary. - 4
  • There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. - 3.5
  • There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. - 4
  • It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). - 4
  • It is correct. - 5
  • It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. - 3
  • It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). - 5
  • It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. - 2
  • The references and links to external pages are well chosen. - 2
  • I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. - 4
  • This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. - 3

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 13

EktaAggarwal (talk)06:36, 6 February 2018

Hi Ekta,

Thanks for the feedback! Actually, I didn't have enough time to go through all of the materials I wanted to write on the wiki but I'll try to prepare a basic one tonight and make it better and easier to grasp according to your bullet points.

Cheers,

Ainaz

AINAZHAJIMORADLOU (talk)01:13, 7 February 2018