Critique

Overall the page is written very well and easy to follow. As noted by other critiques, it is missing refences to previous work; only after reading part of the page I realized the first paragraphs are explaining a previous work. Similarly, the page is lacking references in general; I think it would be quite difficult for a non-expert person to understand what’s going on as all the machine learning techniques have no references. Altought I think CPSC 522 students all have this background, it would be better to add references to allow non-experts to gather some background.

The topic is relevant for the course. 5 The writing is clear and the English is good. 5 The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students. 5 The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5 The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5 There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.- There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. – It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning. 5 It is correct. 5 It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 5 It was an appropriate unit for a page. 5 It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 1 The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 1 I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 4 This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4 If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 18.5