Critique

I think this page is great and extremely well written. I really like the way you organize your papers. Links to builds on pages and related pages are missing as well as the annotations sections(not reflected in the grade below). The only thing I would change is to create a future work section, where you talk about what can be done in the future given the results of your hypothesis.

The topic is relevant for the course. 5 The writing is clear and the English is good. 5 The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students. 5 The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5 The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5 There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.- There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. - It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning. 5 It is correct. 5 It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 5 It was an appropriate unit for a page. 5 It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 1 The references and links to external pages are well chosen. - I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 5 This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4 If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 19