Suggestions
Samprity Thanks a lot for detailed and valuable feedback. Response inline: Your feedback really helped me a lot
Hi Prithu,
Great page! I really enjoyed reading it. I have worked on ontology and sentiment analysis, so I found this page really interesting. Some questions and suggestions I had:
- In the Sentiment analysis vs Sentiment Aggregation section SVM has been mentioned. But the full form in mentioned in related work section. I think you can mention the full form in the earlier section.
Corrected
- The ontology figure needs to be a bit bigger to improve readability. You can also label it figure 1 as you are referring to it in the text.
Labelling added. For closer look please click on the figure. The figure is big, no matter how large i make, some nodes would still remain hard to read :)
- It would be great if you could provide a link for ConceptNet?
WordNet link added
- MLE and EM mentioned in bayesian inference mean Maximum Likelihood And Expectation Maximization?
Yes, I added pointers too now
- In the aspect sentiment annotation section who is bing liu? The figure needs some explanation.
Ya sorry my bad. Clarified that part
- I was not able to find the restaurant ontology when I clicked on the link.
Links are all fixed now The document name you requested (/ontologies/restaurant.owl|Restaurant) could not be found on this server. However, we found documents with names similar to the one you requested. Available documents: /ontologies/restaurant.owl (common basename) Is it this one? http://wise.vub.ac.be/ontologies/restaurant.owl
- Same thing with the reviews.: Document not found
- I did not understand this line "We also compare with another variant where we augement tree-models the influence learning, in place of strict hierarchy driven weighing." Should it be "augment tree models with influence learning"?
Yes. Essentially vanilla tree is anyway bad. So next was to add learning on tree which did well
- In the training section who is Next?
I am not sure what you mean. There is none "named" next in that section.
- In the example arff file it has been mentioned that you are limiting to 10 relations. By relations do you mean attributes(but there are only 7 attributes in the figure)?
Ya i removed them from figure. Figure and arff do not correspond, so don't match them.