Suggestions

Hi Prithu,

I enjoy reading this page. Just a few suggestions:

One quick proofreading might help.

>Generic Aspect-based Aggregation of Sentiments

You may want to add a sentence about the page in the first part of this section.

“Builds on” should not be in separate words. It was better to mention that in structured sentences.

Bayesian inference should be explained in the background section, not in the proposed framework section.

“lexicons provided by bing liu” needs citation.

Figures do not have numbers.

>Aspect Sentiment Annotation

The figure in this part is not explained enough. There are some parts than need to be explained more.

“work of Mukherjee et al.” needs citation.

You have explained your method very good. But at one glance I can say the texts in this page are too much. You may want to summarize the explanations about the motivations and the background section.

Bahare thanks for the suggestation and proof reading u did for the betterment of the page. Here are my responses:

Hi Prithu,

I enjoy reading this page. Just a few suggestions:

One quick proofreading might help. Yup >Generic Aspect-based Aggregation of Sentiments

You may want to add a sentence about the page in the first part of this section. Ok “Builds on” should not be in separate words. It was better to mention that in structured sentences. Sure I added that Bayesian inference should be explained in the background section, not in the proposed framework section. Not sure. As in this secction i dnt introduce general bayesian learning, as that would take even more words, for what you already complained. Rather I explain how i use it in my required settings. Hope this makes sense “lexicons provided by bing liu” needs citation. right Figures do not have numbers. added >Aspect Sentiment Annotation

The figure in this part is not explained enough. There are some parts than need to be explained more. I fixed it with a less confusing (hopefully :-)) figure now

“work of Mukherjee et al.” needs citation. True You have explained your method very good. But at one glance I can say the texts in this page are too much. You may want to summarize the explanations about the motivations and the background section. Tried a precise version now.