critique

Hi Ricky,

A solid draft. I don't think I fully understand it at this point, but the writing style and organization are good, and I understood enough that I'm confident the rest would come in time. You also make it evident what the contribution of the second paper is, which is good.

General comments:

• I think having more links would be good in cases where you use terms another student may not know, but that is outside the scope of the paper to explain.
• It's good that you have the sources for the figures when I click on them, but it would probably be good to cite them directly in the page as well.

Section-specific comments:

• Laplacian pyramid
  • I think a figure would be really useful here, even though there's one in the next section.

Nicely done!

Clear skies,
Jordon

Great; I'll add figures for the Laplacian pyramid. (Switched some arrows for the existing figure.)

The problem with adding links beside terms that other students may not know is that.. I don't know which terms others may not know.

Thanks for feedback!