critique

Is the page missing a part? If parts are missing, I will be happy to rewrite the critique once the page is finished :)

It is not really clear which paper(s) are analized. It might be helpful to add the “sentence summary” and the “conclusions / future applications” sections, following the wiki page template. Links in “Realted pages” not working. It would be useful to add links for “Builds on”, in order to understand the theory behind the page and the papers; this would help the page to be at a more appropriate level for CPSC 522 students. The technical part is difficult to follow for someone outside the field, without appropriate links or references where non experts can find some background.

On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree": • The topic is relevant for the course: 4 • The writing is clear and the English is good: 5 • The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds): 2 • The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand: 3 • The abstract is a concise and clear summary: 5 • There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear: 2 • There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code: 5 • It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic): 4 • It is correct: 5 • It was too short for the topic (i.e., 1 means too long, 3 means about right): 2 / 3 • It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page): 5 • It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki: 2 • The references and links to external pages are well chosen: 4 • I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic: 3 • This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate: 2 If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 12.