Critique
Hi Dandan,
Nice work! Your page is informative and has nice examples. I have a few suggestions:
- There are some grammatical errors in the page. You should revise and correct them.
- It would be better if you could briefly explain the mathematical formulas you have used in the page.
- While the content of the page is generally good, presentation can be improved: Image sizes are too small
- "The Builds-on" and "More general than" sections below the abstract have not been updated yet. Please place links to appropriate related pages.
Scores:
- [5] The topic is relevant for the course.
- [3] The writing is clear and the English is good.
- [5] The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds).
- [3] The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand.
- [3] The abstract is a concise and clear summary.
- [5] There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.
- [4] There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code.
- [5] It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic).
- [5] It is correct.
- [4] It was neither too short nor too long for the topic.
- [5] It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page).
- [3] It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki.
- [5] The references and links to external pages are well chosen.
- [3] I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic.
- [3] This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate.