peer feedback

I really enjoyed reading about this topic!

The examples are quite nice to show its capabilities,

It would make it a bit clearer if you wrote the variables in latex when describing the objective function.

I would like to perhaps know a bit more about the advantages and disadvantages of this algorithm, I found the last few paragraphs a bit confusing in their structure.

(5) The topic is relevant for the course.

(4) The writing is clear and the English is good.

(5) The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds).

(4) The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand.

(5) The abstract is a concise and clear summary.

(5) There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.

(-) There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code.

(4) It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic).

(5) It is correct.

(5) It was neither too short nor too long for the topic.

(5) It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page).

(5) It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki.

(5) The references and links to external pages are well chosen.

(5) I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic.

(4) This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate.