Critique and feedback

Good work on the article! It was well articulated and i like the use of images. Some things concerning from the article were:

• In "Long-Short-Term-Memory" section, while you have written the equations, but there is not sufficient explanation accompanying the equations and meaning of $h_{t}-1$ is missing.
• May be there is some confusion due to structure of the page, but i didn't get that how LSTM, Recurrent Neural Network Language model, Character-level Convolutional Neural Network and Highway Network are related to each other.
• Also, from reading the article its difficult to make out the boundary between the two papers who are presenting. I think you need to change your use of words to reflect that you are explaining some else's paper.

I a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree" please rate and comment on the following:

• The topic is relevant for the course. -5
• The writing is clear and the English is good. -5
• The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). -5
• The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. -4
• The abstract is a concise and clear summary. -5
• There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. -4
• There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. -4
• It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). -4
• It is correct. -5
• It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. -5
• It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). -5
• It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. -5
• The references and links to external pages are well chosen. -5
• I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. -4
• This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. -4

If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 16

Will add a paragraph connecting the dots. Thanks for the feedback.