Critique

• The topic is relevant for the course. 5
• The writing is clear and the English is good. 5
• The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5
• The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand.5
• The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 3
• There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 4
• There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. 5
• It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5
• It is correct. 5
• It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 5
• It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 5
• It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 5
• The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 5
• I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic.4
• This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate.4
• If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 19

Well written, the figures and equations are meaningful and well used. A couple comments: The one sentence summery should be expanded Each figure caption should reference which paper it came from I think you should end add a paragraph explicitly comparing the papers and talking about the contributions of the second paper, I'm not sure if the relation is clear (expect that the both address the same problem)

Thank you for your suggestions. Will address the issues you mentioned.