Critique

Hi Prithu,

Nice work! Your page is generally well written and has good coverage. I have a few suggestions:

  1. You should use math tags for variables to improve the presentation of your page.
  2. Some of the images in the page are too small.
  3. There are a few typos and grammatical errors which should be corrected.

Scores for first draft:

  • [5] The topic is relevant for the course.
  • [4] The writing is clear and the English is good.
  • [5] The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds).
  • [5] The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand.
  • [5] The abstract is a concise and clear summary.
  • [4] There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.
  • [4] There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code.
  • [5] It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic).
  • [5] It is correct.
  • [4] It was neither too short nor too long for the topic.
  • [5] It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page).
  • [5] It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki.
  • [4] The references and links to external pages are well chosen.
  • [4] I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic.
  • [4] This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate.
AdnanReza (talk)07:47, 5 February 2016