Comments

Looks good to me! Here are my scores:

(5) The topic is relevant for the course.

(4) The writing is clear and the English is good.

(5) The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds).

(3) The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand.

(4) The abstract is a concise and clear summary.

(5) There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.

(*) There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code.

(3) It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic).

(5) It is correct.

(5) It was neither too short nor too long for the topic.

(4) It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page).

(4) It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki.

(3) The references and links to external pages are well chosen.

(4) I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic.

(4) This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate.

Some comments:

1. Double check for grammar issues.

2. You may need to be careful about format.

3. You may need to use math notations for your example (Section 6.2 and 7.1).

4. You may need to add more references.

5. Should we add some examples of real world applications of BN at the end (not just figures)?

In summary, the content is pretty good. And it will be better if you improve the format.

Yan

Hi Yan,

Thank you for reviewing this page. I have made a lot of changes and addressed the problems you kindly pointed out. Regarding the real world application, I believe the case study reflects an actual possible application of BN. Moreover, the liver diagnosis model that I referred to ,is considered a real project with BN. However,to address your concern I've extended the application discussion and put more insight to it.

Thanks for your valuable comments.
Yaashaar