Critique
I thought it was very well written on a subject that has interesting potential for the future. The use of examples was also helpful. It would be great if you could add in more figures. Pictures would also help break down the wall of text and make it seem less long.
With regards to your concerns about length, perhaps cutting down the literature review a bit could be a solution. Instead of reviewing each historical paper, simply summarize the conclusions and directions the landscape of research is taking and provide links to papers in the bibliography. This assignment focuses on "looking forwards" so a shorter section on the background shouldn't be penalized.
On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "strongly disagree" and 5 means "strongly agree" please rate and comment on the following:
- The topic is relevant for the course. 5
- The writing is clear and the English is good. 5
- The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds). 5
- The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 4
- The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5
- There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear. 5
- There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. -
- It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic). 5
- It is correct. 5
- It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 3
- It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page). 3
- It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. -
- The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 5
- I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 5
- This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4
If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 18