Comments

Hey Victor, Great job - really well planned and written wiki! I struggle to find any helpful critique or advice to give you as a result. The one thing that I would suggest, following from Eric, is that on top of using fewer direct quotations I would also reconsider removing direct references to the authors of the works you are citing. For example you reference Larry Hackman several times. I would suggest either a) removing references to his name in order to make your wiki more general and accessible to a non-scolarly audience who may be more confused/hindered rather than aided by references to unfamiliar scholars or b) contextualize who Larry Hackman is and why you are referencing his work, perhaps even inserting a hyperlink to information about him. I'm really looking forward to see how you develop your case studies section which I think is a really important aspect of your wiki. Particularly I would like to see how you tie in the role of social media to archival advocacy in both the "archives 2.0" and the "case studies section".

Hi Victor, I really like how your wiki has come along, especially your use of visuals and video- it really enhances the page. My only suggestion for this week is to maybe shorten the overview as it is quite long and perhaps put rest of the info in the current overview in section 1 or throughout the rest of your page. Again, great page!

Thanks for the feedback on the overview Kaitlin because I was just thinking myself that it's a bit on the longer side, but as it is with your writing, every word is like a child, it's hard to move/get rid of them. It's good to know though that other readers are finding it long, I will definitely shorten it and move some of the content elsewhere.

Best,

V