Jump to content

Science:Math Exam Resources/Courses/MATH220/December 2011/Question 03/Solution 1

From UBC Wiki

Using both hints, we can rewrite the statement into equivalent statements as follow

[(P⇒Q)⇒R]∨(¬P∨Q)≡[(¬P∨Q)⇒R]∨(¬P∨Q)≡¬(¬P∨Q)∨R∨(¬P)∨Q≡(P∧¬Q)∨R∨(¬P)∨Q≡[P∨R∨(¬P)∨Q]∧[(¬Q)∨R∨(¬P)∨Q]

The last equivalent statement is of the type A AND B with

A=P∨R∨(¬P)∨QB=(¬Q)∨R∨(¬P)∨Q

which both are tautologies since they contain P OR not P and respectively not Q OR Q. So if both A and B are tautologies, then so is the conjunction of them into the statement A AND B.