Jump to content

Science:Math Exam Resources/Courses/MATH101 A/April 2024/Question 18 (b)/Solution 1

From UBC Wiki

We saw in part (a) that f(x)=22+x+21−x=∑n=0∞(−x2)n+∑n=0∞2xn, where the first series converges if and only if −1<−x/2<1, and the second series converges if and only if −1<x<1. Since have the following sequence of equivalences −1<−x/2<1⟺1>x/2>−1⟺2>x>−2, we see that the first series has radius of convergence 2.

We see then that, if −1<x<1, then both series converge, and so their sum converges as well. This suggest that the radius of convergence is R=1, but we still need to check that the radius of convergence is not larger. Indeed, the example ∑n=0∞xn+∑n=0∞−xn=0 shows that it is possible a sum of series to converge with a larger radius than the radii of the summand series. To see that this does not happen for us, we must check how the series for f(x) behaves at x=±1.

At x=−1, we find the partial sum: SN=∑n=0N((−x2)n+2xn)=∑n=0N12n+∑n=0N2(−1)n=1−(1/2)N+11−(1/2)+2⋅{1 if N is even0 if N is odd , which may be computed using the formula ∑n=0Nxn=1−xN+11−x. The point is that, because of the second term in SN, the limit limN→∞SN does not exist, so our series for f(x) does not converge for x=−1.

At x=1, the nth summand of the series for f(x) is (−x2)n+2xn=(−12)n+2, which is positive and does not converge to 0 as n tends to infinity. Therefore the series does not converge at x=1 either. This completes the proof that the radius of convergence is indeed 1.