Jump to content

Science:Math Exam Resources/Courses/MATH101 A/April 2024/Question 18 (b)/Solution 1

From UBC Wiki

We saw in part (a) that f(x)=22+x+21x=n=0(x2)n+n=02xn, where the first series converges if and only if 1<x/2<1, and the second series converges if and only if 1<x<1. Since have the following sequence of equivalences 1<x/2<11>x/2>12>x>2, we see that the first series has radius of convergence 2.

We see then that, if 1<x<1, then both series converge, and so their sum converges as well. This suggest that the radius of convergence is R=1, but we still need to check that the radius of convergence is not larger. Indeed, the example n=0xn+n=0xn=0 shows that it is possible a sum of series to converge with a larger radius than the radii of the summand series. To see that this does not happen for us, we must check how the series for f(x) behaves at x=±1.

At x=1, we find the partial sum: SN=n=0N((x2)n+2xn)=n=0N12n+n=0N2(1)n=1(1/2)N+11(1/2)+2{1 if N is even0 if N is odd , which may be computed using the formula n=0Nxn=1xN+11x. The point is that, because of the second term in SN, the limit limNSN does not exist, so our series for f(x) does not converge for x=1.

At x=1, the nth summand of the series for f(x) is (x2)n+2xn=(12)n+2, which is positive and does not converge to 0 as n tends to infinity. Therefore the series does not converge at x=1 either. This completes the proof that the radius of convergence is indeed 1.