We saw in part (a) that

where the first series converges if and only if

, and the second series converges if and only if

.
Since have the following sequence of equivalences

we see that the first series has radius of convergence

.
We see then that, if
, then both series converge, and so their sum converges as well. This suggest that the radius of convergence is
but we still need to check that the radius of convergence is not larger. Indeed, the example

shows that it is possible a sum of series to converge with a larger radius than the radii of the summand series. To see that this does not happen for us, we must check how the series for

behaves at

.
At
, we find the partial sum:

which may be computed using the formula

. The point is that, because of the second term in

, the limit

does not exist, so our series for

does not converge for

.
At
, the
summand of the series for
is
which is positive and does not converge to 0 as
tends to infinity. Therefore the series does not converge at
either. This completes the proof that the radius of convergence is indeed 1.