Course talk:CPSC532:StaRAI2020:R-GCN

From UBC Wiki

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Feedback118:18, 22 March 2021
Feedback118:16, 22 March 2021

Great summary! As I was reading, I thought the idea of the second paper, but worried the introduction of those new vectors per relation would lead to overfitting and to extremely high computational costs. It seems like the authors addressed the overfitting issue, which is great. Did they measure the increase of computational costs or address it in any way?

LuccaSiaudzionis (talk)00:45, 22 March 2021

Hey Lucca, they have not directly addressed the issue of computational costs. Nonetheless, if you look at the last equation in the page, you can modify the number of vectors which you build your weights from (parameter b). In this way you can control the computational costs. However the authors didn't measure or add a section on that issue.

ObadaAlhumsi (talk)18:18, 22 March 2021
 

Hi, great article. Did the paper provide empirical evidence on some benchmark datasets? I think it will help in quantifying how big this incremental change was.

MAULIKMAHESHBHAIPARMAR (talk)09:56, 22 March 2021

Hey Maulik, this is not applicable to this set of papers. The incremental change enabled the GCN framework to be used for link prediction and entity classification, which was not possible with the original GCN structure. Thus this is a change that created a new functionality rather than improve performance

ObadaAlhumsi (talk)18:16, 22 March 2021