Course talk:CPSC522/Game Theory

Looks good to me! Here are my scores:

(5) The topic is relevant for the course.

(4) The writing is clear and the English is good.

(5) The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds).

(4) The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand.

(5) The abstract is a concise and clear summary.

(5) There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.

(*) There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code.

(4) It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic).

(5) It is correct.

(4) It was neither too short nor too long for the topic.

(5) It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page).

(4) It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki.

(5) The references and links to external pages are well chosen.

(5) I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic.

(4) This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate.

Comments:

In the last section, some examples maybe helpful :)

Thanks for the inputs! We will try to include them.

Awesome page, Samprity Kashyap,Junyuan Zheng, Ke Dai and Arthur Sun. I really loved the depth of material covered in your page. Game Theory has a lot of core concepts and you guys have managed to put those key ideas in easily understandable manner. I loved the availability of examples and the use of external links. I have a couple of suggestions that I believe would help you to make the page even better:

• The definitions related to Game Theory could have a bit more explanation. You could also add some mathematical notations in some of the key concepts.
• To add up to my previous point regarding mathematical notations, the proof of the existence of Nash Equilibrium using Kakutani fixed point theorem uses a lot of mathematical notations which were introduced all of a sudden. Putting some of them before might ease the reader slowly into that section at which point he/she will easily understand the proof.
• You could also add the type of game the two examples (Prisoner's Dilemma and Rock Paper Scissors ) are which will better illustrate the types of game introduced earlier

Thanks for the suggestions! I will try to implement them. I was thinking of removing the proof of Nash Equilibrium as it might be complicated for the wiki page.