Course:CONS200/2024WT1/Climate change and border conflict: Water conflict in Central Asia
Introduction
Central Asia, which includes Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, is facing big problems related to water. Water is very important in this mostly dry region, as it is needed for farming, producing electricity, and for daily life. Two major rivers, the Amu Darya and Syr Darya, flow through several of these countries before ending in the Aral Sea. During the Soviet Union era, these rivers were heavily used for large irrigation projects to grow cotton and other crops. This led to environmental damage that is still affecting the region today, especially because these countries now have to share these limited water resources.
Climate change is making the water scarcity problem even worse in Central Asia. As temperatures rise and rainfall patterns change, there is less water available. Glaciers in the Tien Shan and Pamir mountains, which are important sources of water for the region, are melting faster. This means that, over time, there will be less water flowing into the rivers, especially in the summer when it’s needed most. Droughts are also happening more often, which puts even more pressure on water supplies. Since farming is a major part of the economy in Central Asia, water shortages can have serious impacts on food production and people’s jobs.
Water scarcity is also a political issue in Central Asia because the countries in this region all depend on the same rivers. Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, which are upstream, rely on the rivers for hydropower, especially in the winter. But countries downstream, like Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Kazakhstan, need the water during the summer for farming. This difference in seasonal needs often leads to disagreements, as water stored for electricity in winter isn’t always available for crops in the summer. These disagreements can lead to tension between countries, with each one focused on getting the water it needs for its own people.
Another part of the problem is that the water infrastructure in Central Asia is outdated. During Soviet times, water was managed centrally without much thought to the borders of individual countries. After the Soviet Union collapsed, the new countries had to figure out how to share and manage water on their own. Several agreements have been made to help with this, but enforcing them is hard, and they don’t always work.
The connection between climate change, water scarcity, and border conflicts in Central Asia. Cover the main issues, current solutions, and some ideas for how to make water management in the region more sustainable. With climate change continuing to affect Central Asia, cooperation between these countries will be important to prevent conflict and ensure stability.
Scope and Intensity of the Problem
Geographic and Historical Background
The Amu Darya River is the largest river in central Asia with a length of 2,540 km and a catchment area of 309,000 sq. km. It originates in Afghanistan on the Glacier in the Vakjidjir Pass and it stretches out into Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan where it terminates in the Aral Sea (Wegerich, 2010). The Syr Darya is the other major river of Central Asia, it is the longest river in the area with a length of 3,019 km but a smaller catchment area of 219,00 sq. km. The Syr Darya originates from the Tien San Mountains in Kyrgyzstan and is shared by Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Kazakhstan where it eventually drains into the Aral Sea (Wegerich, 2010).
The Aral Sea was formerly the fourth-largest lake on the planet and at one point, it had a lower salinity level relative to other great lakes. This allowed for it to be inhabited by a majority of freshwater fish species which supported the local fishing industries, and the large size of the lake acted as a key regional transportation route (Micklin, 2010). This was until 1960 when efforts to use the inflow from the two major rivers to bolster the irrigation of water for agriculture were used during the time of the Soviet Union. This expansion of irrigation increased at such a rapid rate that the fishing industry collapsed and then the sea began to rapidly rise in salinity leading to most of it drying up. This ended with the Aral Sea splitting into the three smaller lakes that are around today (Wegerich, 2010).
Climate Change Impacts on Water Availability
Up to this point, climate change has not contributed much to the desiccation of the Aral Sea and the struggles with water availability in Central Asia. However, it is expected that the effects of climate change will play a more of a major role in the future (Micklin, 2010). Aridity is expected to increase across the entire region with increased temperatures and decreased precipitation during summer and fall (Lioubimtseva, 2014). These climatic shifts will exacerbate the region's water scarcity which is already struggling due to the high demand for water irrigation and frequent floods. Another issue with increasing temperatures is that glacial runoff from the sources of the two major rivers, will increase temporarily. Eventually, the glacial mass is expected to decline putting the two major rivers at risk (Lioubimtseva, 2014).
Socio-Economic and Political Implications
The water conflict in Central Asia significantly influences the region's political and socio-economic dynamics. Shared reliance on the Syr Darya and Amu Darya rivers has fueled geopolitical tensions between the upstream nations of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, who focus on hydroelectric power generation, and the downstream states of Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, who depend on these water sources for agriculture (EIAS, 2023). Disputes over water allocation, the timing of seasonal releases, and unilateral projects like dam construction often escalate into political conflicts, with water being wielded as a tool of leverage (UNDP, 2006). On the socio-economic front, agriculture is vital for economic stability, particularly for Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, where it contributes substantially to GDP and employs a significant portion of their populations. Water scarcity poses threats to food security and livelihoods, especially as inefficient irrigation systems and climate change intensify the challenges of water management in the region (EIAS, 2023).
Border Conflicts and Resource Competition
In Central Asia, border conflicts are frequently intertwined with water disputes, as access to vital water resources often crosses national boundaries. In 2014, there was a border clash between the border guards of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan that resulted in seven people being injured over the construction of a road on a disputed territory that was rich in water resources (Pena-Ramos, 2021).
Often, local communities in these regions face heightened competition over dwindling resources, sometimes resulting in violent clashes. A different case in 2014 happened in the Fergana Valley, a region in Uzbekistan that borders Kyrgyzstan, where an Uzbek man was killed by a Kyrgyz man while waiting for his share of irrigation water (Pena-Ramos, 2021). This presents the issue with shared water infrastructure, such as irrigation canals and reservoirs, where they often become points of contention (UNESCAP, 2023).
Current Remedial Actions
The critical Water-Sharing Agreements
The Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers are two of Central Asia’s most precious resource. These are regulated by water-sharing agreements. Consequently, the Interstate Commission for Water Coordination (ICWC) was formed among the states located in the regions that share a river, namely Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan as well as Turkmenistan. Despite having a central role in coordinating water usage and distribution, this commission is faced with many challenges. For example, one major restriction concerns lack of enforcement mechanisms thereby reducing the agreements’ effectiveness. Allocation of water often breeds political wrangling because some nations are very dependent on these common sources but however cannot reach an agreement due to their differences [1](Micklin, 2016: 348).
However, amid such challenges it has been observed that the ICWC has encouraged dialogue and cooperation albeit there is need for more holistic models which can equate to the transboundary complexity of water resources. Increasingly, as resource stresses deepen due to climate alternations so does it call for amendment of these pacts to accommodate environmental flips and promote mutual values (Schlüter et al., 2013:225).
The Role of International and Regional Organizations
The international and regional organizations play a significant role in resolving disputes about water in Central Asia. One of the organizations that play active role in helping the region transition to more sustainable water management practices is the United Nations. Additionally, The World Bank has a long history of providing financial resources and technical assistance for sustainable water resources management including better irrigation methods, which consume less water and restoring infrastructure through modernization by increasing efficiency (Abdullaev, Giordano, & Rasulov, 2021, p. 51).
An illustrative example is the “Transboundary Water Resources Management” project that seeks to enhance cooperation among Central Asian states through training programs and investment in infrastructure. In addition to that, these international activities bring along fund but they also posses technical knowledge essential during initiation of functional plans of agriculture (Jalilov, Amer & Ward et al., 2018) Thus, they underscore the need for collective action and mutual responsibility by illustrating how a resource transcending national boundaries should be managed.
Technological and Infrastructural Efforts
An investment in technological advancements as well the improvement of infrastructure is crucial for sustainable water management under various initiatives within Central Asia. Several efforts have been made towards upgrading irrigation systems at the expense of improving water distribution efficiency on top of minimizing its losses through upgrade of irrigation infrastructure (Zupan & Železnik, 2011, p. 935). As an illustration drip irrigation systems were introduced into farming and this has proved to be viable especially when it comes to areas with little precipitation like deserts where one can not expect any rains throughout the year hence no need for irrigation but using moisture from air(Schwarz and Lapola, 2009, p. 271).
Moreover, there has been a rise in pilot projects that advocate for the utilization of satellite technology so that people can monitor how water is used (Jawitz et al., 202). Some national and regional initiatives use remotely-sensed data to estimate water availability and withdrawal rates in near-real time improving planning processes regarding water (Zimmermann et al., 2006). Utilization of technology enables nations to have efficient use of their limited freshwater resources in response to the adverse effects of climate change like decreased rainfall amounts(Water et al., 2019).
Community-Based Initiatives and Adaptation Strategies
Grassroots community-based approaches are key drivers of water conservation efforts and sustainability. Citizen groups and local farmers have increasingly incorporated practices such as rainwater harvesting and crop rotation to climate change-related shocks that include droughts among others. This way they augment supply while at the same time boosting ability to withstand dry spells in their respective areas thus ensuring better resource use within them both in terms of improved access to clean drinking water (Rajaratne & Malone, 2013). For example, residents in some parts of Kyrgyzstan have come up with rainwater collection systems which enable them in capturing and storing the rain for agricultural purposes especially during long stretches without any rains. This not only conserves but also gives people an opportunity to own their own (SERVIR Eastern & Southern Africa, 2018). Also, Awareness creation programs on the significance of water conservation are necessary for promoting sustainable water-use habits within societies.
From Conflict to Cooperation: Technical, Environmental ,Legal, Economic, Social and Cultural Pathways for Effective Water Resource Management
Technical and Environmental Recommendations
Managing water resources amid growing demands and the effects of climate change requires innovative technological solutions. Advanced irrigation techniques, such as drip systems, soil sensors, and precision watering, can significantly improve water efficiency in agriculture by reducing waste and enhancing crop yields (FAO, 2022). Additionally, introducing drought-resistant crops developed through plant genetics can reduce dependency on water resources, offering a sustainable solution for arid regions (Smith & Brown, 2021).
Increasing the use of renewable energy sources like solar and wind can reduce reliance on hydropower, which is highly dependent on river flows. Transitioning from hydropower to renewable energy sources alleviates pressure on water resources while providing sustainable energy options (Gleick, 2020).
Environmental restoration efforts, including reforestation and wetland rehabilitation, are also critical in maintaining healthy watersheds. Forests play a key role in retaining water within ecosystems, slowing runoff, and supporting river health. Planting trees around vital watersheds can help stabilize water supplies and improve water quality, benefiting both human and wildlife populations (Mansourian & Vallauri, 2019).
Economic and Financial Perspectives
Investment in shared water infrastructure, while financially demanding, is essential for regional stability. Funding cross-border projects like dams, reservoirs, and water pipelines ensures the equitable distribution of water, especially during droughts. This investment can reduce political tensions by providing a reliable water supply and fostering economic interdependence among neighboring countries (Dinar & Dinar, 2021).
Water markets present another economic solution, enhancing water use efficiency by allowing water to be traded between areas of varying demand. However, establishing water markets requires robust regulatory frameworks to protect vulnerable communities and ensure fair distribution (Young, 2019). Success in this area relies on creating transparent systems where both public and private investments work toward long-term water conservation goals.
Political and Legal Solutions
Effective management of transboundary rivers requires comprehensive political and legal frameworks. Diplomatic initiatives, including multilateral and bilateral negotiations, are vital for fostering cooperation and preventing conflict (Wolf, 2007). Dialogue platforms enable not only government officials but also community representatives and NGOs to establish sustainable water-sharing agreements.
Robust legal frameworks are essential to enforce water-sharing regulations. International treaties should incorporate dispute resolution mechanisms, transparent data-sharing policies, and clear implementation strategies to ensure compliance (McCaffrey, 2009). Such frameworks must be adaptable to changing environmental conditions, such as the variable rainfall patterns caused by climate change.
Social and Cultural Considerations
Acknowledging local knowledge and cultural perspectives is crucial for effective water management. Local communities often possess extensive
understanding of sustainable water practices passed down through generations. Involving these communities in decision-making processes ensures that solutions are culturally sensitive and more likely to be accepted (Agrawal, 2014).
Water management can also serve as a platform for conflict transformation, promoting water as a shared resource rather than a source of division. Collaborative water management projects can foster peacebuilding and strengthen relationships between communities and nations, contributing to regional stability (Conca, 2002).
Conclusion
Water scarcity and border conflicts in Central Asia exemplify the complex interplay between environmental challenges, resource management, and regional stability. Climate change exacerbates these pressures, accelerating glacial melt and altering precipitation patterns, which threaten critical water sources like the Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers. These rivers, vital for agriculture, energy production, and daily life, are often at the center of disputes between nations with conflicting needs.
The legacy of water mismanagement during the Soviet era, which focused on large-scale irrigation projects, continues to undermine ecological and socio-economic stability in the region. The desiccation of the Aral Sea remains a powerful symbol of the consequences of unsustainable practices. The collapse of this once-thriving ecosystem disrupted livelihoods tied to fishing and agriculture, while also creating severe public health and environmental challenges for local communities. Addressing these issues requires a coordinated, transboundary approach to water management that prioritizes ecological restoration and sustainability.
Although regional agreements, international assistance, and technological innovations offer pathways toward improvement, significant obstacles persist. Aging infrastructure, weak enforcement of water-sharing agreements, and rising demand for limited resources necessitate more integrated and forward-thinking solutions. Strengthening diplomatic frameworks, investing in modernized infrastructure, and empowering local communities to manage resources sustainably are essential for long-term progress. International organizations such as the United Nations and the World Bank can play a critical role by providing funding, expertise, and technical assistance to improve water-use efficiency and build resilience against the impacts of climate change.
For Central Asia to achieve a sustainable future, collaboration must take precedence over competition. Embracing advanced technologies, enhancing environmental restoration efforts, and fostering inclusive governance can help the region adapt to the challenges posed by climate change and resource scarcity. Cooperative initiatives, such as transboundary water management programs, have the potential to transform water from a source of tension into a foundation for peace and stability. By recognizing the interconnectedness of environmental, economic, and social factors, Central Asian nations can work toward equitable water management, ensuring security and prosperity for generations to come.
- ↑ Micklin, P. (2010). "The past, present, and future Aral Sea". Lakes & Reservoirs: Research & Management. 15 (3): 193–213
References
- Abdullaev, I.; Giordano, M.; Rasulov, A. (2021). "Addressing water challenges in Central Asia: A cooperative approach". Water Resources Management. 35 (1): 45–58. doi:10.1007/s11269-020-02753-1.
- Menga, F. (2017). "Hydropolitics beyond the river: The geopolitics of water in the Nile Basin". Global Environmental Politics. 17 (1): 97–113. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00389.
- Sehring, J.; Diebold, A. (2014). "The politics of water institutional reform in neo-patrimonial states: A comparative analysis of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan". Water Alternatives. 7 (2): 154–176.
- Jalilov, S. M.; Amer, S. A.; Ward, F. A. (2018). "Water, food, and energy security: An elusive search for integration in Central Asia". Water. 10 (12): 1890. doi:10.3390/w10121890.
- Micklin, P. (2016). "The Aral Sea disaster". Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 44: 345–370. doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012428.
- Hagg, W.; Mayer, C.; Lambrecht, A.; Kriegel, D.; Azizov, E. (2013). "Glacier changes in the Big Naryn Basin, Central Asia, 1943–2002". Global and Planetary Change. 110: 160–170. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.08.006.
- Schlüter, M.; McAllister, R.; Arlinghaus, R.; Bunnefeld, N.; Eisenack, K.; Hölker, F.; Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2013). "New horizons for managing the environment: A review of coupled social-ecological systems modeling". Natural Resources Modeling. 26 (1): 219–247. doi:10.1111/nrm.12030.
- Micklin, P. (2010). "The past, present, and future Aral Sea". Lakes & Reservoirs: Research & Management. 15 (3): 193–213.
- Peña-Ramos, J. A.; Bagus, P.; Fursova, D. (2021). "Water conflicts in Central Asia: Some recommendations on the non-conflictual use of water". Sustainability. 13 (6): 3479.
- Wegerich, K.; Warner, J. (2010). The politics of water: A survey. Routledge.
- Lioubimtseva, E. (2014). "Impact of climate change on the Aral Sea and its basin". The Aral Sea: The devastation and partial rehabilitation of a Great Lake. Springer. pp. 405–427.
- "Water and climate in Central Asia: From conflict to cooperation". European Institute for Asian Studies (EIAS). 2023.
- "Water security in Central Asia and the Caucasus". United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). 2023.
- "Water conflict and cooperation in Central Asia". United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2006.
- Agrawal, A. (2014). "Indigenous knowledge and the politics of sustainable development". Annual Review of Anthropology. 23: 413–437.
- Conca, K. (2002). The case for environmental peacemaking. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
- Dinar, A.; Dinar, S. (2021). The Economics of Water Allocation: Mechanisms and Efficiency. Cambridge University Press.
- FAO (2022). The State of Food and Agriculture: Water use efficiency. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- Gleick, P. H. (2020). "Renewable energy and water resources". Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 45: 39–63.
- Mansourian, S.; Vallauri, D. (2019). Forest restoration in landscapes: Beyond planting trees. Springer.
- McCaffrey, S. C. (2009). The Law of International Watercourses: Non-Navigational Uses. Oxford University Press.
- Smith, J.; Brown, L. (2021). "Water-efficient crop varieties and food security". Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 34 (2): 87–102.
- Wolf, A. T. (2007). "Shared waters: Conflict and cooperation". Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 32: 241–269.
- Young, M. D. (2019). "Water markets: Opportunities and risks". Science Advances. 5 (3). eaav9187.